innocence blog

A Web log for the Innocence Institute of Point Park University

Friday, February 03, 2006

Not Guilty, But Not Off the Hook

This article is republished here in its entirety.
Thursday, February 02, 2006
By John Agar
The Grand Rapids Press
GRAND RAPIDS -- After 13 years in prison, Larry Souter found out freedom isn't free: He owes $38,000 in back child support.
Never mind that the debt accumulated while he was locked up, wrongly convicted of murder.
Souter, 53, was ordered to court Wednesday to explain why he shouldn't be held in contempt. If the hearing had not been postponed, his answer was simple: He was in prison before his second-degree murder conviction was overturned late last year. Prison wages barely covered necessities.
Souter didn't want to talk, but the courthouse certainly was on his list of least favorite places to visit.
He was convicted in 1992 for the 1979 death of Kristi Ringler, 19, near White Cloud. Attorneys later found evidence that could have helped him at trial, reports suggesting the victim was hit by a motor home's mirror. Medical examiners also backed off conclusions that Ringler was killed by a whiskey bottle.
A Newaygo County judge vacated Souter's guilty verdict.
In 1987, Souter was ordered to pay $100 a week in his divorce with Christine Souter. He stopped paying when he went to prison in 1992, but didn't ask to have payments suspended until 1995.
Court documents show that in 1997, he owed $23,000 in back support. As of last month, interest and penalties had pushed it to $38,082.25.
Federal law prohibits judges from retroactively wiping out such debts, Souter's attorney, John Smietanka, said.
He hoped they could reach an agreement with his ex-wife.
"He can't even find a job, let alone find this kind of payment," Smietanka said. "Larry wants to (pay), he definitely wants to deal with this in a fair way."
His ex-wife's attorney, David Sarnacki, wrote in court records that she "has endured the substantial burden of raising her two children without defendant's contribution of child support."

5 Comments:

  • At 6:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I just can't believe that his ex-wife wouldn't at least try to work something out with him. He was wrongly imprisoned for something he didn't do. She may have raised their children by herself; but he had no choice in the matter himself. He lost 13 years of his life, his job, his family, and from what I've read he's also lost the respect of the community. Give the guy a break!!

     
  • At 6:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

  • At 12:51 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

  • At 9:51 AM, Anonymous buy viagra said…

    What an interesting article. I was looking for another think but by a fluke I found your blog, and I must say I spent my time reading your post. I really enjoyed it.

     
  • At 6:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I wonder if the government agencies are aware that the failure or refusal to process requests for downward modifications violates federal law (see 42 USC 666 (a)(10)(A)(i))?

     

Post a Comment

<< Home